भारतमाला परियोजना
दावा
लेखापरीक्षा से समर्थित नहीं
डिलीवरी
आंशिक रूप से पूरा
निर्माण की गति तेज़ ज़रूर हुई — लेखापरीक्षा दर्ज करती है कि यह 2018-19 के प्रतिदिन 1.04 किलोमीटर से बढ़कर 2022-23 में 12.37 किलोमीटर हुई। पर प्रमुख कार्यक्रम पर अगस्त 2023 में संसद में रखी कैग निष्पादन लेखापरीक्षा ने पाया कि मंत्रिमंडल द्वारा स्वीकृत 34,800 किलोमीटर में से 13,499 किलोमीटर पूरा हुआ — 38.79 प्रतिशत — जबकि स्वीकृत धन का 158.24 प्रतिशत पहले ही मंज़ूर हो चुका था, और वह भी स्वीकृत ₹15.37 करोड़ के मुक़ाबले ₹32.17 करोड़ प्रति किलोमीटर पर। कार्यक्रम के सभी 35 लॉजिस्टिक्स पार्क अविकसित रहे, और जिस लॉजिस्टिक्स प्रदर्शन सूचकांक को सुधारना घोषित उद्देश्य था उसके लिए मंत्रालय ने कोई लक्ष्य ही तय नहीं किया।
“सड़क संपर्क: अभूतपूर्व गति से सड़क निर्माण के अपने मौजूदा पड़ाव को आगे बढ़ाते हुए हम अगले पाँच वर्षों में 60,000 किलोमीटर राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग बनाएँगे। हम 2022 तक राष्ट्रीय राजमार्गों की लंबाई दोगुनी करेंगे।”लेखापरीक्षा अवधि: 1 अक्तू॰ 2017 — 31 मार्च 2023
31 मार्च 2023 तक स्वीकृत 34,800 किलोमीटर में से 26,316 किलोमीटर आवंटित हुआ — 75.62 प्रतिशत — और 13,499 किलोमीटर पूरा, यानी 38.79 प्रतिशत, जबकि स्वीकृत परिव्यय का 158.24 प्रतिशत मंज़ूर हो चुका था और वह भी स्वीकृत ₹15.37 करोड़ के मुक़ाबले ₹32.17 करोड़ प्रति किलोमीटर पर। जिस लॉजिस्टिक्स प्रदर्शन सूचकांक को कार्यक्रम सुधारने वाला था उसके लिए कोई लक्ष्य तय नहीं हुआ, न मंत्रिमंडल समिति द्वारा निर्देशित परिणाम-मानकों के लिए। 35 बहुविध लॉजिस्टिक्स पार्कों में से एक भी विकसित नहीं हुआ। पहले की अटकी परियोजनाएँ उन्हीं रास्ते के अधिकार और वन विवादों को सुलझाए बिना शामिल कर ली गईं। अनुकूलन प्रक्रिया केवल भारतीय राष्ट्रीय राजमार्ग प्राधिकरण के लिए हुई, उसका लक्ष्य लगभग 160 प्रतिशत बढ़ाया और मंत्रिमंडल की स्वीकृति से अधिक लंबाई जोड़ी, इसलिए दावा किया गया आधार सत्यापित नहीं हो सका। अन्य योजनाओं में स्वीकृत 1,752 किलोमीटर की 78 परियोजनाएँ भारतमाला की उपलब्धि बताई गईं, और उसे दिखाने में अन्य योजनाओं के ₹1,57,324 करोड़ लगे। प्राधिकरण ने स्वीकृत ₹2,09,279 करोड़ के मुक़ाबले ₹3,00,349 करोड़ उधार लिए। ऊँची लागत के एक्सप्रेसवे मंत्रिमंडल या मंत्रालय की जाँच से बच निकले।
लेखापरीक्षा अवधि
13,499 km completed under Bharatmala Phase-I against 34,800 km approved
यह लेखापरीक्षा केवल भारतमाला के प्रथम चरण को, मार्च 2023 तक कवर करती है। राष्ट्रीय राजमार्गों की लंबाई अन्य कार्यक्रमों से भी बढ़ती है, जो इस लेखापरीक्षा में शामिल नहीं हैं।
Performance Audit on Implementation of Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
The 2019 Sankalp Patra makes two road commitments in consecutive lines, one a quantity and one a ratio: "we will construct 60,000 kms of National Highways in the next five years" and "We will double the length of National Highways by 2022."
Doubling is the harder claim, because it is a statement about the whole network rather than about one programme. The flagship programme through which most of the addition was to come is Bharatmala Pariyojana, approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs in October 2017: 34,800 km in Phase-I at ₹5,35,000 crore, to be developed by September 2022 — the same deadline as the manifesto's doubling promise. The CAG's performance audit of that phase was tabled on 10 August 2023.
Start with what went right, because the audit says it plainly. The pace of construction rose from 1.04 km a day in 2018-19 to 12.37 km a day in 2022-23, and awarding from 6.50 km to 15.17 km a day — achieved partly through the pandemic. On acceleration, the manifesto's premise was correct.
On delivery against the approved plan, it was not. By 31 March 2023 — six months past the programme's own deadline — 26,316 km had been awarded, "75.62 per cent of the CCEA approved length", and 13,499 km completed, "38.79 per cent of CCEA approved length". Less than two-fifths of Phase-I existed as road.
The money moved in the opposite direction from the kilometres. "Upto 31 March 2023, when only 75.62 per cent of CCEA approved length has been awarded, 158.24 per cent of CCEA approved financial outlay has already been sanctioned." Per kilometre, sanctioned civil cost was ₹23.89 crore against ₹13.98 crore approved, and pre-construction cost ₹8.28 crore against ₹1.39 crore — a sixfold rise on the second. NHAI had borrowed ₹3,00,349 crore by 2021-22 against ₹2,09,279 crore approved as the borrowing source for the whole phase, the excess "utilised for meeting the higher fund requirements due to time and cost overrun".
Two findings go to whether the reported achievement is what it appears. First, the exercise that was supposed to select highways on freight and traffic evidence was done only for NHAI, raised its target "by around 160 per cent to 64,675 km", and added length "beyond the lengths approved by CCEA" — so the ministry's claim that the lengths came from origin-destination studies, freight projections and geo-mapping "was, therefore, not verifiable in audit". Second, and more directly: of 97 projects covering 2,244 km that NHIDCL reported as Bharatmala achievements, "78 projects (1,752 km) were approved in schemes other than BPP-I", with ₹1,57,324 crore of other schemes' funds "being utilised to report BPP-I achievement".
The programme's purpose was freight efficiency, and the two things that would have delivered it did not happen. All 35 Multi Modal Logistics Parks, included precisely "to facilitate efficient and seamless freight movement", were undeveloped as of March 2023. And the objective on which approval partly rested was never translated into anything measurable: "one of the stated objectives of the Pariyojana was to improve the Logistics Performance Index (LPI) of India. However, MoRTH did not set any targets/milestones/action plan to improve the Index" — nor for accident reduction, riding comfort or user satisfaction, which the Cabinet committee had specifically directed, nor any mechanism to monitor them.
Two governance findings complete the picture. Projects that had been stuck under the previous highways programme were folded into Bharatmala "without resolving the existing impediments… viz., availability of right of way or pending disputes regarding forest land including wildlife sanctuaries", and "these projects again got stuck". And some of the largest projects escaped the scrutiny their size required: the Delhi-Vadodara and Dwarka expressways among others "could not be assessed by either CCEA or MoRTH", and even the appraisal mechanism the Cabinet committee itself laid down "was also not strictly followed."
India's national highway network grew substantially in this period, and roads were built faster than before. But the promise was to double the network by 2022, and the programme carrying most of that had built 38.79 per cent of its own approved length by 2023 while spending more than one and a half times the approved budget. Our verdict is not supported.
BJP Sankalp Patra 2019 — Lok Sabha election manifesto
“Through this Sankalp Patra, you would get a glimpse of the challenges of the yesteryears, the indomitable efforts made by 130 crore Indians to overcome those challenges and our collective vision for the future… There are two commitments that I am extremely passionate about — doubling of farmer income and housing for all, by the year 2022.”
Performance Audit on Implementation of Phase-I of Bharatmala Pariyojana, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
“Upto 31 March 2023, when only 75.62 per cent of CCEA approved length has been awarded, 158.24 per cent of CCEA approved financial outlay has already been sanctioned.”